There are many arguments about the effects of our food consumption. In particular, the consumption of meat is often portrayed as harmful, be it for the climate, for food supply or for our health. What we
eat and how we process it effects water consumption, here the concept of water footprint is the most used. Treehugger says that if you really want to reduce your water foot print you should cut back on meat. The Guardian calls for water foot print labelling.
While a human being needs a few litres of water to drink, at least 1000
times as much water is used for production of food. The
water needed for foods varies tremendously and varies for the same product
under different conditions. Often the figures mix ‘blue’ water—water in rivers and lakes,
‘green’ water—water in rainfall and in the soil, and ‘grey’ water—the water
needed to absorb or purify the waste. The water footprint - per kg - of beef is big, ten times as big as for grain and fifty
times bigger than for vegetables, if water sources are counted.
Water use (l/kg)
|
||||
Green
|
Blue
|
Grey
|
Total
|
|
Beef
|
14414
|
550
|
451
|
15415
|
Nuts
|
7106
|
1367
|
680
|
9153
|
Lamb
|
8253
|
457
|
53
|
8763
|
Ckicken
|
3545
|
313
|
467
|
4325
|
Egg
|
2592
|
244
|
429
|
3265
|
Oil crops
|
2023
|
220
|
121
|
2364
|
Grains
|
1232
|
228
|
184
|
1644
|
Milk
|
863
|
86
|
72
|
1021
|
Root crops
|
327
|
16
|
43
|
386
|
Vegetables
|
194
|
43
|
85
|
322
|
Sugar crops
|
130
|
52
|
15
|
197
|

In general many people jump to conclusions when it comes to food. Mostly, they jump in the direction of a choice they already made.
No comments:
Post a Comment