Recently, I wrote an
article about how difficult it is to survive as a commercial smallholder
and floated some ideas of why that is and what can be done about it. I want to
follow up with two articles. This one is about the production capacity of small
farms and the next one will be on labor productivity and its implications for
the space of consumption for small holder farmers and its capacity to generate
surplus labor for other societal purposes.
I often see the claim that peasants/small farms/small holders/family
farms produce seventy percent of all the food in the world. The 70 figure
originates from a report by the ETC Groups in 2009, Who Will Feed Us? Questions for the Food and Climate Crises. The
original has been revised and the current
version from 2017 states that the ”ETC Group estimates about 70% of the
population – 4.5–5.5 billion of the world’s 7.5 billion people – depend on the Peasant
Food Web for most or all of their food”.
Geoffrey, a successfull small holder in Zambia, photo:Gunnar Rundgren |
While I am a small farmer myself and very sympathetic to the
future of small farms in a similar way as the ETC group, I think it is
important to have the facts straight. To begin with, the poorest 70% consume a
lot less than 70% of the food in the world, as people in the richer countries,
who mainly depend on the industrial food chain consume a lot more food per
capita. Notably, the ETC report says
that 70% of the population depend on the peasant food web for most or all of
their food. This is not at all the same as that peasants produce 70% of the food as ”to
depend on” doesn’t mean that all their foods come from this food web. Many of
the poorest people buy salt, sugar, vegetable oil and other commodities which
are mainly from the industrial food web. In addition many small farms raise
chicken, pigs or have a dairy goat or cow for which they buy some commercial
feed, which means that the product from these animals are not only from the
Peasant Food Web.
There can be put several question marks about some of the
categories of people which are included in the figure of people who ”depend” on
the Peasant Food Web. The figure includes 1 billion urban farmers. But there is
no billion urban farmers who produce most of their own food. Most urban farmers
produce vegetables or small animals, none of them are staple food. ETC claims
that 34% of all meat is produced in cities, and even if we accept that figure
(which I am quite convinced is grossly exaggerated) it is quite obvious that
the feed of the animals are not produced in the cities and most likely that
most of the feed has its origin in the industrial food chain. 2.5 billion
people are said to get some or most of their food from street vendors and
according to ETC those street vendors get most of their food from peasants. I
have looked into food chains in many different countries and I believe that the
assumption that most street vendors get their food from peasants has no factual
basis.
It is very difficult to make the distinction between the
Peasant Food Web and the Industrial Food Chain that the ETC make. In many
countries there is a continuum of farming systems from small scale food
production oriented to self-sufficiency to large scale farms for commodity
trading. And there are many peasants engaged primarily in commercial production
also of non-food items such as flowers or export crops such as coffee. Many of
those buy their food. When I visited small scale palm oil producers on Sumatra
2017, all of them had quit growing their food and bought noodles and canned
mackerel.
And there are interdependencies in the webs and chains.
Irina Petrovna in the village Peredavik in Kaluga in Russia, which I visited
last year, has four cows and she sells the milk products (milk, smetana,
butter, yoghurt) directly in the neighborhood. Her cows graze communal land but
the hay for the winter comes from the big farm nearby. And it is similar for
many of Russia’s 17 million small backyard farms in Russia. This even goes back
to Soviet times when it was common that collective farmers also had a smaller
private farm and used the resources of the collective for their backyard
production.
In the article, How
much of the world's food do smallholders produce? by Vincent Ricciardi and
colleagues, published in Global Food Security, the researchers estimate that
small farms produce “28–31% of total crop production and 30–34% of food supply
on 24% of gross agricultural area.” They define small farms as those having
less than 2 hectare. In this research,
livestock production and fisheries are not included. The selected farm size
limit is very small, In Sweden units with less than 2 hectares are not even
defined as a farm. Our own farm with around 1 hectare of vegetables and fruits,
8 hectares of arable grassland and 13 hectares of permanent grassland certainly
would qualify as a very small farm in this country.
Considering the differing conditions in the world and the
difficulties in classification, I don’t think it is possible to get a “correct”
figure. Whatever method is used there will be flaws and things to criticize.
There is also no need to inflate the figures to prove that small farms can
produce sufficient food. The existing situation is an expression of economic
conditions and says little about the potential for small farms to produce
sufficient food (in a similar way as the extent of organic farms or regenerative
farms says anything about the potential of those systems). As the research by
Riccardi and colleagues show the production of food per unit of land is rather
higher on small farms than on big farms. This is corroborated by research in
the USA which shows that yield per hectare also for a staple crop like corn is
more or less the same in small farms as in bigger ones.
A historical perspective also helps: In Sweden in 1949 dairy
farms produced 5 million tons of milk while the total production today is 2.8 million tons. In 1949 there were 300,000 farms producing milk, with an average
of 5 cows per farm; almost all milk was produced on small farms. Today the
average dairy farm has around 100 cows, and there are just above 3,000 farms
left. Most farms are still called family farms but can’t really be called small
farms as we talk about investments of 2-10 million dollars or euro just to keep
a few people occupied. The farms of 1949 used considerably less fossil fuels,
artificial fertilizers, tractors and imported soy to produce almost twice as
much milk. In some regards they were much more efficient than the prevailing
production.
The key message is that the potential of small
farms for global food production is determined by economic conditions rather
than biological, ecological or agronomic limitations.
I agree fully with your conclusions in this post. Small farms could provide all our food, just like they did for thousands of years, but the ready availability of cheap energy has promoted the substitution of mechanical labor for the human and animal labor that were used on those small farms in the past. This ongoing substitution is placing much of the world's population in a dangerously vulnerable position.
ReplyDeleteIf the flow of cheap energy to the agricultural, transportation or food processing sectors of industrial economies is interrupted even briefly, food supplies will plummet and famine will spread. Since there are so many things that could rapidly diminish or even totally block that energy flow, from war to financial crisis or even the effects of depletion on market prices, industrial agriculture rests on a fragile foundation that could collapse at any time.
And considering that, because of global warming, we should not even be using the 80% of the cheap energy that comes from fossil fuels, it is the height of imprudence to maintain a food system that depends on that energy.
One way or another, industrial agriculture will fail. Policies that promote farms that use little or no fossil fuels are needed to protect society against a catastrophic failure of food production. I think the only farms that can meet that standard are very small farms that use lots of human and animal labor.
But as long as we continue to use cheap fossil energy, large farms will always economically out-compete small farms. Instead of racing to build a sustainable system of small farms and move vulnerable populations out of cities, we just continue to let markets work their "efficiencies". How foolish we are.